time to live :: health and fitness

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Watching Your Cholesterol

My recent health screening showed rather high cholesterol levels. Some subsequent research on the web turned up a number of sites which could explain what LDL's and HDL's were, but none of them listed what their nutritional sources were.


I finally found this article in my bookmarks, which presents a solid and concise review on cholesterol without getting too scientific or technical. The website is from the Harvard School of Public Health.


In the past I have found The Nutrition Source to be rather unbiased and very useful in plowing through some of the many confusing nutritional guidelines and recommendations. There is very little hype and certain myths are also debunked. I always suspected that eggs were not the deadly food the press made it out to be. And margarine, far from being healthy, is godawful stuff.


Are you watching your cholesterol?

Friday, February 22, 2008

Variety is the Spice of Life

We all know that familiar feeling that a change is required. Maybe you're stuck in a rut, or tired of the 'same old, same old'.

Scientist are trying to verify this principal in the realm of romance, of all places. It would seem that couples who try new settings or venues for dates are likelier to keep the romance alive. Apparently the same feelings that gave you sweaty palms and a runaway heart-rate just from holding hands with your first flame can be evoked decades later with your longtime spouse.

Read the NY Times article

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

The Scoop on Shoes - Pt. 1

Get yourself more than one pair of shoes to train in. Don't let the cost scare you. This can be accomplished with no extra expense if you rotate your purchases. Buy your second pair of shoes when your first ones are at their half-life.


Having two pairs of shoes allows you to address different training needs. Purchase a heavier pair with more cushioning for longer distance runs. Buy a lighter shoe for those shorter, faster runs.


If your training doesn't vary that much, get two pairs of the same shoes. With two pairs of shoes, it's easier to tell when the older pair is worn out and needs to be replaced.


You can decrease the likelihood of injury if you have more than one pair of shoes. It's hard to find a shoe that meets all your needs - like cushioning, stability, pronation. Maybe one of your shoes causes a certain kind of stress. Wearing that shoe every other day cuts the stress in half. You also have a chance to recover from that stress on the off-day.


Maybe you feel you'd like to try a new line of shoes. It's nice to break in a new pair of shoes slowly, especially a brand you've never worn. With two shoes you can slowly bring the new pair of shoes into the rotation by wearing them for shorter runs and only wearing them every three or four days initially.


Variety is the spice of life. Altering your training can make your runs more interesting. Getting that second pair of shoes might just add a little extra kick to your exercise regimen, with little or no extra cost.

Friday, November 23, 2007

The price isn't always right

Bill Bowerman began creating running shoes from a waffle iron back in the 70's. His concept blossomed into a new company called Nike, which prospered in the wake of the new running craze.


The running shoe has evolved steadily and considerably since then. Most cheap running shoes now-a-days are vastly superior to the best running shoes from back then. Features likes support, stability, and cushioning have been well-refined and are found in every shoe.


I have noticed for the last ten years now, that within a line of shoes, there is often little (or no) difference between the cheap shoes and the expensive ones. There is also scientific evidence that bears this conclusion out.


In a recent study, runners were asked to try shoes of varying costs that had the outside features covered up. After trying them out on a tread mill they were asked to guess the price of the shoes. The runners did very poorly at predicting the price of the shoe based on comfort and performance. This would lead one to believe that within a line of shoes you don't get more features for the money. They just look cooler.